From colin at colino.net  Fri Jan  9 11:00:49 2009
From: colin at colino.net (Colin Leroy)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:00:49 +0100
Subject: [Gpg4win-devel] [Gpg4win-commits] r1077 - in trunk: . patches
 patches/claws-mail-3.7.0
In-Reply-To: <20090109100211.A302640738@pyrosoma.intevation.org>
References: <20090109100211.A302640738@pyrosoma.intevation.org>
Message-ID: <20090109110049.0cd1fef3@paperstreet.colino.net>

On Fri,  9 Jan 2009 11:02:11 +0100 (CET),
scm-commit at wald.intevation.org wrote:

Hi,

>    trunk/patches/claws-mail-3.7.0/

I've commited these fixes as patches (out of our CVS) instead of
grabbing the whole CVS snapshot: it'll allow more stability. I think
the time where Claws Mail was in beta for Win32 is over, so shipping
CVS snapshots isn't the correct thing to do.

Are you guys fine with that way?

-- 
Colin

From wk at gnupg.org  Fri Jan  9 11:55:44 2009
From: wk at gnupg.org (Werner Koch)
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:55:44 +0100
Subject: [Gpg4win-devel] [Gpg4win-commits] r1077 - in trunk: . patches
	patches/claws-mail-3.7.0
In-Reply-To: <20090109110049.0cd1fef3@paperstreet.colino.net> (Colin Leroy's
	message of "Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:00:49 +0100")
References: <20090109100211.A302640738@pyrosoma.intevation.org>
	<20090109110049.0cd1fef3@paperstreet.colino.net>
Message-ID: <874p08bvf3.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>

On Fri,  9 Jan 2009 11:00, colin at colino.net said:

> Are you guys fine with that way?

Fine with me.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.


From marcus.brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de  Fri Jan  9 12:49:53 2009
From: marcus.brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de (Marcus Brinkmann)
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:49:53 +0100
Subject: [Gpg4win-devel] [Gpg4win-commits] r1077 - in trunk: . patches
 patches/claws-mail-3.7.0
In-Reply-To: <20090109110049.0cd1fef3@paperstreet.colino.net>
References: <20090109100211.A302640738@pyrosoma.intevation.org>
	<20090109110049.0cd1fef3@paperstreet.colino.net>
Message-ID: <496739E1.3010803@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

Colin Leroy wrote:
> On Fri,  9 Jan 2009 11:02:11 +0100 (CET),
> scm-commit at wald.intevation.org wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>>    trunk/patches/claws-mail-3.7.0/
> 
> I've commited these fixes as patches (out of our CVS) instead of
> grabbing the whole CVS snapshot: it'll allow more stability. I think
> the time where Claws Mail was in beta for Win32 is over, so shipping
> CVS snapshots isn't the correct thing to do.
> 
> Are you guys fine with that way?

We use patches sometimes as well, it's at your discretion.  More
stability is certainly welcome at this point.

I am still undecided what is less work, cutting a new snapshot or
integrating a patch.  I go back and forth myself.

Thanks,
Marcus


From colin at colino.net  Fri Jan  9 12:56:10 2009
From: colin at colino.net (Colin Leroy)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:56:10 +0100
Subject: [Gpg4win-devel] [Gpg4win-commits] r1077 - in trunk: . patches
 patches/claws-mail-3.7.0
In-Reply-To: <496739E1.3010803@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
References: <20090109100211.A302640738@pyrosoma.intevation.org>
	<20090109110049.0cd1fef3@paperstreet.colino.net>
	<496739E1.3010803@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Message-ID: <20090109125610.497b816a@paperstreet.colino.net>

On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:49:53 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:

Hi,

> I am still undecided what is less work, cutting a new snapshot or
> integrating a patch.  I go back and forth myself.

For me, a new snapshot requires a bit more work for Claws - first I
have to create it, upload it, update packages.current, remove the old
source, grab the new source, make clean, rebuild everything. A patch
requires putting the patch in, removing src/stamps/*claws-mail*, then a
fast rebuild. :)

-- 
Colin

From marcus.brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de  Fri Jan  9 17:13:01 2009
From: marcus.brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de (Marcus Brinkmann)
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:13:01 +0100
Subject: [Gpg4win-devel] [Gpg4win-commits] r1077 - in trunk: . patches
 patches/claws-mail-3.7.0
In-Reply-To: <20090109125610.497b816a@paperstreet.colino.net>
References: <20090109100211.A302640738@pyrosoma.intevation.org>	<20090109110049.0cd1fef3@paperstreet.colino.net>	<496739E1.3010803@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
	<20090109125610.497b816a@paperstreet.colino.net>
Message-ID: <4967778D.5050107@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

Colin Leroy wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:49:53 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>> I am still undecided what is less work, cutting a new snapshot or
>> integrating a patch.  I go back and forth myself.
> 
> For me, a new snapshot requires a bit more work for Claws - first I
> have to create it, upload it, update packages.current, remove the old
> source, grab the new source, make clean, rebuild everything. A patch
> requires putting the patch in, removing src/stamps/*claws-mail*, then a
> fast rebuild. :)

Yeah, but editing and testing the patch sometimes takes me a while :)

You will enjoy "make clean-claws-mail", btw.

Thanks,
Marcus