[Openvas-devel] Preparing OpenVAS 3.0: features and timeline

[Jan-Oliver Wagner]

On Wednesday 09 September 2009 11:27:44 Felix Wolfsteller wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 September 2009 11:06:42 Matthew Mundell wrote:
> > I think OpenVAS-Client should be brought in line with the daemon names
> 
> I definately agree with that. The mixed case "OpenVAS-Client" is some weird 
> name for an executable.
> 
> Which might bring up another 3.0 "feature" that also would clean up code in 
> client a little bit:
>  - separate executables for the "batch mode" (non-graphical) and the gtk 
> client (i think that is a nice "junior job" btw).

agreed. This was a permanent source of confusion in the past.
Still, I have to move my minds a bit more about the client name scheme ...

Best

	Jan
-- 
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner |  ++49-541-335084-0  |  http://www.greenbone.net/
Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück
AG Osnabrück, HR B 202460 | Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner