[Openvas-devel] Call for Votes CR #48: Define OMP/OAP in RelaxNG Schema Language

Jan-Oliver Wagner Jan-Oliver.Wagner at greenbone.net
Tue May 11 00:24:46 CEST 2010


On Thursday 06 May 2010 13:23:26 Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Am 22.04.2010 18:57, schrieb Hartmut Goebel:
> > I've just uploaded change request #48 (see
> > <http://www.openvas.org/openvas-cr-48.html>) and am looking forward to
> > you comments on this issue.
> 
> Since there were no complaints or objections, I'd like to call for votes
> now and would like to ask you to cast your vote by May 16t.

I had not much time to look into this, so sorry for my late comment.

A processable description of the protocols is a good idea in principle.

I am not happy with the bashing language against the current state
of OMP/OAP. It is work in progress and thus by definition not complete
nor bug-free. Justifying RelaxNG with this work-in-progress-state seems
wrong to me. I'd prefer to not leave the text as is.

Best

	Jan

-- 
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner |  ++49-541-335084-0  |  http://www.greenbone.net/
Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 202460
Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner


More information about the Openvas-devel mailing list