[gnessus-discuss] Project Source Control Requirements
neuro at well.com
Thu Nov 3 11:06:54 CET 2005
William Anderson wrote:
> We also need to make a final decision on our preferred method of
> revision control - the primary candidates are Concurrent Versions System
> (CVS) and Subversion (SVN). Our options are at present are:
> - Remain As-is
> - Retain Host, Move to SVN
> - Move to SF (CVS)
> - Move to SF (SVN)
> - Third Party Offer (CVS/SVN)
> Please discuss these options or contribute further options or proposals
> on the discussion list at gnessus-discuss at gnessus.org
Tim has come up with another option on IRC for discussion and possible
selection via consensus.
- Remain As-is, Migrate Later
Continue using CVS hosted at Nth Dimension; plan and implement
switch to SVN before the end of the year
Pros: no extra immediate work required; debian developer already
using tree; allows time to properly plan and perform migration
to subversion; defrays admin resource and allows other
services to be brought up / rebadged in interim, i.e.
website, lists, etc.
Cons: not all team members wish to work with CVS; continued cost
to Nth Dimension
_ __/| William Anderson | It's called a "changeover." The movie
\`O_o' neuro at well dot com | goes on, and nobody in the audience has
=(_ _)= http://neuro.me.uk/ | any idea.
U - Thhbt! GPG 0xFA5F1100 | -- the Narrator, "Fight Club"
More information about the Openvas-discuss