[Openvas-discuss] OpenVAS - ready to try? Or not?
timb at nth-dimension.org.uk
Wed Jul 9 20:52:20 CEST 2008
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 15:16:11 Jonas Andradas wrote:
> I am not a Debian developer, nor mantainer or packager (at least yet)
> but I think it would make sense to package the non-GTK client
> separately, since most logically the GTK client package must have gtk as
> a dependency, and for a headless machine it would be otherwise
> unnecesary to have gtk installed. So probably the best way to go would
> be to have the non-GTK client in a package and the GTK one as a
> different one that would replace the non-GTK client if installed (my
> guess here).
Good call, I don't see why we shouldn't be able to do this.
<mailto:timb at nth-dimension.org.uk>
More information about the Openvas-discuss