Hi Bernhard!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Bernhard Herzog <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bernhard.herzog@intevation.de">bernhard.herzog@intevation.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 07.09.2010, Bernhard Reiter wrote:<br>
> Am Dienstag, 7. September 2010 16:37:06 schrieb Igor Novikov:<br>
> > Great! I will create 0.6.18 branch to store all old sources unmodified.<br>
><br>
> Not necessary, 0.6.17 is tagged, just go at the skencil-0.6 branch.<br>
<br>
</div>Well "store all old sources unmodified" sounds a bit scary, although it's not<br>
clear to me what that might mean exactly. </blockquote><div><br>If we create a copy of <a name="skencil-0.6" href="http://wald.intevation.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/skencil/branches/skencil-0.6/?root=skencil">skencil-0.6/</a> as a skencil-0.6.18/ we provide an easy access<br>
to ver.0.6.17 for users which prefer SVN version of application. <br><br>If such branching style is not suitable for the project so I can commit all changes into skencil-0.6/ <br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Anyway, if the changes to 06<br>
branch are done in such a way that it's possible to follow them by reading<br>
the diffs (i.e. small self-contained changes with good commit messages), that<br>
may be OK. But please don't do any wholesale changes like converting all<br>
indents to tabs without prior discussion.<br></blockquote><div><br>It's naturally because Skencil has own style coding conventions.<br></div></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Regards,<br><br>Igor Novikov<br>sK1 Project<br>
<a href="http://sk1project.org" target="_blank">http://sk1project.org</a><br><br><br>