<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Bernhard Reiter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bernhard@intevation.de">bernhard@intevation.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Am Donnerstag, 16. September 2010 16:02:51 schrieb Igor Novikov:<br>
<div class="im">> > > 2.Source code is separated from other files<br>
> ><br>
> > A good goal in principle, do you have a list of specific changes<br>
> > you are proposing?<br>
><br>
> 1. Skencil/, Resources/, Script/ and Plugins/ are moved into src/ folder<br>
> 2. Lib/ folder is eliminated and all native modules are relocated into<br>
> Skencil/Modules/ folder<br>
> 3. Pixmaps/ is moved from Skencil/ into Resources/<br>
> 4. Root "skencil" package is introduced<br>
> 5. All native extensions source code is relocated in extensions/ folder<br>
<br>
</div>I am looking at it comparing to what I see in<br>
<a href="https://wald.intevation.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/skencil/branches/skencil-0.6/?root=skencil" target="_blank">https://wald.intevation.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/skencil/branches/skencil-0.6/?root=skencil</a><br>
which you are about to change, as far as I understand, right?<br>
<br>
So you also rename "Sketch" to "Skencil"? Would be okay.<br>
Overall it looks like a more intensive reorganisation.<br>
As you and your team are the only active committers right now,<br>
and if this makes you more productive: Go ahead.<br></blockquote><div><br>OK. I will start committing today.<br><br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im"><br>
> Concerning ver.1.0 I would prefer maintaining release 0.6.18 and after that<br>
> final ver.1.0 which will be<br>
> last in tk branch. Gtk port could be started as ver.1.1<br>
<br>
</div>I think the shuffling of files and the introduction of distutils<br>
would warrant a 1.0 release right away. It still is a maintenance release,<br>
but it would reflect the state of the software much better.<br>
<br>
I would call a port to GTK or Qt version 2.<br>
The problem with any major step in development is that it will not get<br>
a lot of user support unless it is almost as good as the "stable" version<br>
and this usually means a lot of development time.<br></blockquote><div><br>It's not a problem. But if we are going to announce 1.0 version we should<br>polishing UI and functionality before release but not only project revitalizing.<br>
I think this will take ~1 month. So Skencil release will be possible at <br>the end of October.<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Regards,<br><br>Igor Novikov<br>sK1 Project<br><a href="http://sk1project.org" target="_blank">http://sk1project.org</a><br>
<br><br>