[Getan-commits] [PATCH] TODO: add multi-selection Bug report

[Wald Commits]

# HG changeset patch
# User Magnus Schieder <mschieder at intevation.de>
# Date 1516277255 -3600
# Node ID 08b61b78285dcd51f126adb8a07268b7d02bf9a6
# Parent  dc79952b36b01b675a4d1dc87eba77e1bec38a75
TODO: add multi-selection Bug report.

diff -r dc79952b36b0 -r 08b61b78285d TODO
--- a/TODO	Thu Jan 18 11:29:29 2018 +0100
+++ b/TODO	Thu Jan 18 13:07:35 2018 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,61 @@
+20180117 Magnus Schieder
+
+  20170317 BER: Reproduce and then fix a defect that it is surprising which
+  entries are moved by `m` or deleted by 'd'.
+  It probably has to do how multi-selection are handled. Maybe they
+  are not cleared properly at the end of an operation.
+  One description: It happens when you have changed a lot of entries
+  from different projects (I assume), e.g. by editing the description,
+  the length or timedate and then use move where you intend to only move
+  one, the unwanted result is several moved entries.
+
+  Update:
+  getan 2.1
+
+  Creating a new database with test data:
+
+  1) Delete getan_test_data.db if it already exists to create a new database.
+  2) Execute getan_test_data.py to get the test database getan_test_data.db.
+     (getan/test_data/getan_test_data.py)
+
+- Bug 1.0
+  2) Open getan with the test database. (getan /path/getan_test_data.db)
+  3) Switch to the entries from the project pro1 with tab.
+  4) Mark with return and arrow keys ent1 and ent2.
+  5) Go back to the projects with tab.
+  6) Switch back to the entries of project pro1.
+  7) Mark this time ent3 and ent4.
+  8) Press m, then 3 and then y to move ent3 and ent4 to pro3.
+
+  Expectation:
+    ent3 and ent4 are moved to pro3.
+
+  Result:
+    ent1, ent2, ent3 and ent4 were moved to pro3.
+
+- Bug 1.1
+  Execute 1) to 7) from 1.0.
+  8) Press d to delete ent3 and ent4.
+
+  Expectation:
+      ent3 and ent4 are deleted.
+
+  Result:
+    ent1, en2, ent3 and ent4 are deleted.
+
+- Bug2
+  Execute 1) to 4) from 1.0.
+  5) Press m.
+  6) Now also mark ent3 and pro ent4.
+  7) Press 3 and then y to move ent1, ent2, ent3 and ent4 to pro3.
+
+  Expectation:
+    After pressing m, you can not mark additional entries.
+
+  Result:
+        Only ent1 and ent2 are moved, though all are selected.
+
+
 20180104 BER (minor) Display licensing information with --version and
   usage. Implementation idea: change this when moving away from optparse.
 
@@ -10,15 +68,6 @@
 20170504 BER: Some multi-user installations do not want a logfile by default.
   We could solve this requirement by making it configurable.
 
-20170317 BER: Reproduce and then fix a defect: that it is surprising which
-  entries are moved by `m` or deleted by 'd'.
-  It probably has to do how multi-selections are handled. Maybe they
-  are not cleared properly at the end of an operation.
-  One description: It happens when you have changed a lot of entries
-  from different projects (I assume), e.g. by editing the description,
-  the length or timedate and then use move where you intend to only move
-  one, the unwanted result is several moved entries.
-
 20160912 BER: Better code: states.py: classes EditEntryState and
   AdjustEntryState have same methods exit() and set_focus(), maybe join them?