[Gpg4win-devel] Very slow gpgme_get_key()

[Volker Birk]

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:44:25PM +0100, Andre Heinecke wrote:
> A big difference for me was in the past keyring v.s. keybox. When importing a 
> large keyring it was an order of magnitude slower to use keyring instead of 
> using keybox. Maybe your Windows system still has a keyring?

I'll check, thanks for the hint! But it's only 80 keys as I said…

> And when comparing command line v.s. GPGME are you using --with-colons an the 
> command line with the keylist? In the past we had some bugs regarding TOFU 
> that were only visible when using --with-colons. [1]

Hm… I don't know what GPGME is doing internally.

> If you see a big difference between a simple gpgme usage (e.g. tests/run-
> keylist) v.s. command line please open a ticket under:
> 	https://dev.gnupg.org/
> With your example commands / test.

OK. I'm investigating further. When I have a minimum test where it bites
me I'll file.

Thank you,
VB.
-- 
Volker Birk, p≡p project
mailto:vb at pep-project.org
https://prettyeasyprivacy.com
https://pep.foundation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/gpg4win-devel/attachments/20180227/3d5c7e71/attachment.asc>