[Skencil-users] what about AUTOPACKAGE ??

[Bernhard Reiter]

Am Samstag, 12. August 2006 02:21 schrieb Marco Amato:
> On 8/10/06, Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2006 00:47 schrieb Marco Amato:
> > > > http://autopackage.org/index.html
> > >
> > > whot about a autopakage for skencil ?
> >
> > Sure, why not. We just need somebody that does it. :)
> > Any takers?
> >
> >
> > While we are at interesting package manager,
> > I like what I saw from smartpm.
> > http://labix.org/smart
>
> I cant promise, nothing, bacause I need to undestand alots of think about
> skencil code and autopackage for make the package .

I thought about this: Autopackage is besat geared towards binaries.
Skencil does come with some binary parts, but the main part 
are the dependencies within the fonts and the Python modules.
I guess that autopackage will not really help with these points
as they are very distribution specific.

> But.. if you say that I can tell in this maillist any question I can start
> to work around this idea !

We will try to answer any question you have.
For technical details we best should use the skencil-devel list.

Bernhard R:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/skencil-users/attachments/20060814/109cb318/attachment.pgp