[Skencil-users] Join forces for skencil1/sK1?

[Bernhard Reiter]

Hi Igor,

On Thursday 14 December 2006 16:03, Igor Novikov wrote:
> As you can see
> on SF, the project has stable activity in downloading, but often Skencil is
> downloaded as "additional backend" for Inkscape, to parse ai files in
> command line mode. It isn't a best role. 

interesting. 

> On my opinion, "all tabs" is better than mixed identation with tabs and
> spaces,  which is observed as in 0.6.x and in 0.7 Skencil branches. 

Personally I prefer "all spaces" to "all tabs", but I agree that mixed is 
worst. 


> >I haven't found the time yet to look at the new code, though.
>
> Preview code is old. This branch was freezed at May, 2006 and used only for
> new UI
> demonstration. Of course, you can find many improvements and bugfixes, but
> in summer preview all these changes were made for UI only. Package
> structure was
> almost the same as in Skencil.
>
> During last months sK1 source code was deeply refactored. Now all widgets
> are
> Tile-based (Ttk:: namespace), many packages are reorganized and
> restructured,
> heavy-weight classes like MainWindow are refactored to decrease size.
> C-based modules are extended to support Cairo engine and LittleCMS color
> managment.
> We plan to expose our SVN after release.

What keeps you from doing this earlier? If Bernhard wants to take a
look it can only be good for your project. ;)


Benrhard (R.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/skencil-users/attachments/20061219/9a3e02c2/attachment.pgp