[Gpg4win-users-en] reply-to "mangling" (was: Release planning (2.0.0rc1 and 2.0.0))

Sorin Srbu sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.se
Fri Jun 26 09:09:33 CEST 2009

>-----Original Message-----
>From: gpg4win-users-en-bounces at wald.intevation.org
>bounces at wald.intevation.org] On Behalf Of Paul
>Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 6:50 PM
>To: gpg4win-users-en at wald.intevation.org
>Subject: Re: [Gpg4win-users-en] reply-to "mangling" (was: Release planning
>(2.0.0rc1 and 2.0.0))
>On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:12:44 +0200
>"Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> wrote:
>> I vote for doing this, that is to say the reply button should put
>> the list address in the top-field.
>I agree with Bernhard  - good email applications are mailing list

Sometimes you have no choice but using Outlook. 8-)

>It may help others on this list, (with not-so-good email
>applications), if you did not add a Reply-To: to your mails. A
>Reply-To header that contains the same address as the From header is
>totally pointless anyway.

Sure, I can do that. It doesn't help me though when I reply to eg this mail
that you wrote; it still adds your personal email address instead of the
list address when I click reply.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5106 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wald.intevation.org/pipermail/gpg4win-users-en/attachments/20090626/393267ec/attachment.bin>

More information about the Gpg4win-users-en mailing list