[Gpg4win-users-en] Some emails not decryptable

[Michaela Azevedo Pires]

I can't add GpgOL to outlook 2016 how do I do it?

Com os meus cumprimentos,
Michaela Pires
michaelapires at isassociados.pt 



Esta mensagem pode conter informação privilegiada e/ou confidencial, destinada exclusivamente ao destinatário. Se não for o destinatário, ou a pessoa responsável pela sua entrega ao destinatário, não pode copiar ou entregar este documento a ninguém. Caso tenha recebido esta mensagem por engano, agradecemos que nos notifique de imediato por telefone. Obrigado. 
Privileged/confidential information may be contained in this message and is intended only for use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or person responsible for delivering it to the person addressed, you may not copy or deliver this to anyone else. If you receive this message by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone. Thank you.



-----Original Message-----
From: Gpg4win-users-en <gpg4win-users-en-bounces at wald.intevation.org> On Behalf Of Andrew Gallagher
Sent: 10 de março de 2021 19:06
To: gpg4win-users-en at wald.intevation.org
Subject: Re: [Gpg4win-users-en] Some emails not decryptable

On 10/03/2021 17:15, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 10 März 2021 15:31:56 schrieb Andrew Gallagher:
>> The email in question is neither a PGP nor S/MIME mail - it is a 
>> notification mail for a web-based "secure maildrop" service (e.g. 
>> McAfee Secure Email Gateway, Cisco Secure Email Encryption Service).
> 
> No, it is a signed S/MIME email (as far as I can see)

Sorry, yes it is signed, but it is not an S/MIME-encrypted email.

> and seems to have been created by a product called "Totemo_TrustMail", 
> I found this product 
> https://www.totemo.com/en/products/email-encryption
> 
> It claims to do OpenPGP, S/MIME and web-based "maildrop".

Maybe it is capable of those technologies but isn't configured?

> And the screenshot hints at an encrypted mail.

That one is, yes. Are there two completely different emails here, or is one attached to the other? Or is the remote system generating two separate mails in the two different formats for the one message? It is unclear.

--
Andrew Gallagher