[Gpg4win-users-en] key 0xEC70B1B8 trustable ? Self-signed SSL cert in DANE dnssec ?

Bry8 Star bry8star at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 16 17:09:35 CET 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,
Is the gpg4win pkg signing key 0xEC70B1B8 trust-able ?

What is the full fingerprint ?

Why it's full key is not shown over a HTTPS secured webpage ?

Why WK (Werner Koch) has not signed it ?

How a regular FIRST time gpg4win users suppose to trust binary
packages ?

Why are you not signing your website's DNS with DNSSEC ? (or Why are
you not placing your site's DNSSEC code in ISC DLV (free) site ? )

Why are you not declaring your own website's own SSL cert's hash in
the TLSA/DANE dns record ?

Thanks in advance,
- -- Bright Star.

(When replying, please make sure to include only one email address
in To: field gpg4win-users-en at wald.intevation.org , Thanks)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iL4EAREKAGYFAlKHmL5fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDEyQjc3RjJDOTJCRjI1QzgzOEM2NEQ5Qzg4
MzZEQkEyNTc2QzEwRUMACgkQiDbboldsEOyIqQEA6LrSt88Pc9AxmEswva5D8EmF
VRHQ1JQSLBxey0hdyzYA/1kwXZcjLHs8J91X1Uda01Uq66dCPgpt5tNcSoyGC/4K
=ovb3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gpg4win-users-en mailing list